NightDragon83 said:
spemanig said:
NightDragon83 said:
spemanig said: NOOOOOOOO!!! Bayo does not belong in Smash. She's a third party character who has no prior history with Nintendo and will have been on only one Nintendo console. She doesn't have the credentials. |
Dude if Solid Snake can be a playable character in Smash, who had no history other than his series being on the original NES and a port of MGS on the GameCube, than surely a character from an IP that Nintendo now funds and publishes can be a playable character in the series.
|
Snake shouldn't have been in Smash either.
|
Why not? So no 3rd party characters that Nintendo fans might also be fans of like Sonic and Mega Man should never be featured in a Nintendo game?
I don't know about you but how many times can we see the usual Nintendo cast in yet another SSB or MK game before it starts getting stale?
|
Sonic and Mega Man are fine. They have deep seeded roots and connections with Nintendo. Same with Pacman. Baynetta does not. Snake does not. And Nintendo has enough first party characters to last a century without it getting stale.