By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
forest-spirit said:
pokoko said:
This is why cherry-picking negative quotes to fill an agenda is dishonest and lame. It was silly the way people were attacking Digital Foundry when they had more good to say than bad.


That's what happens when you cut out a small part of an article and create a new topic around it while completely ignoring the rest of what was said. Context is lost and readers will be made to believe that that small part sums up the entire article. It's also worth mentioning that about 99% of forum-goers are of the belief that thread-creators are saints unable of spinning, taking things out of context or downright lying, and therefore checking the source(s) is considered a complete waste of effort.

It's an objective analysis. You don't need to read the whole thing to get to the points you're interested in. Reading the whole article will not change any of the posted facts. There simply is no further context to "this game is 720p and has no AA". It's a simple fact that is important to know for some people. No amount of additional fluff in the article will change it.

What do you want? Do you want "This game is 720p and has no AA but we're not bothered by it"? That's not an analysis anymore but an opinion piece. If you want someone's opinion chewed up for you because you can't make up your own, read reviews!



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.