Is the Wii U (and gaming in general) too weak for the Pokemon game we all want?

[Frogger]

Clyde32 said:

spemanig said:

jonathanalis said:
i see no problem in make the first game with only 151(and a few more, including their evolution, megas, and 6th general mechanics) pokemon.
Make red/blue (re)remake, but the way we want.(as described in this tread)
2 years latter make the gold/silver (re)remake, as and adictive game(all kanto is there, you can restart a new jorney in johto, and after finishing, you get what you had in kanto).
2 years later, ruby/saphire, 2 year DP, more 2 year BW and XY.

I don't think any Pokemon fan would have an issue with that, because it isn't pretending that Pokemon hasn't progressed past 1997. The game these guys want isn't that, though. No megas. Eevee only has 3 evos. Electivire doesn't exist. Dark is still a purely "special" type. No such thing as natures, EVs, special abilities, interest.

Is that what you heard? This is what I heard. 

Boutros said:
We only need 151 Pokémons.

...

You do realize that that is more than 151 Pokemon, right? There are 45 newer Pokemon that are evolutionarily related to the first generation pokemon that were released after the first generation of Pokemon and would have to bring along every single one of the mechanics I just described because they directly relate to how they'd evolve and change.

That's 196 Pokemon. So yes, that's what I heard.