Is the Wii U (and gaming in general) too weak for the Pokemon game we all want?

[Frogger]

Boutros said:

tbone51 said:

Boutros said:

tbone51 said:

Boutros said:
We only need 151 Pokémons.

why? why the originals? there are many pokemon from 152-721 that are better than the originals :-/

Some are fine but if it comes at the cost of having the ones that are attrocious than no thanks.

lol, yeah cuz 151>>>>>152+ -_-

i really hate that excuse, i mean gen 1 had a pile of shit (muk+grimer), a magnet (magnimite) but then people look at vanilluxe and then judge an entire gen!!!

 

edit: this was talking about people in general, not exactly at you. I hate the people who say "Gen1" only things, my favorite gen is 1, but that doesn't blind me!

It's not only the new Pokémons from every new generation that are attrocious. It's the incredible reasons they come up with to justifiy how they never discovered those Pokémons before. It's also everything they added to overcomplicate the lore and the plot.

And I don't see the problem with Muk or Grimer. The best Pokémon designs are the most simple ones. Not those with stripes and dots and messed up shapes on their body or Pokémon that don't even represent anything.

Subjective. And it doesn't matter. Nintendo isn't stupid enough to shun the current Pokemon fandom by only including the originals just to pander to non-fans who will never touch another Pokemon game again and aren't worth the effort.