| TheDrill said: Your logic is flawed, being used on the official Xbox Website does not prove accurracy. That's like claiming that if a false statement is made on TV or shown in a newspaper, it proves it's validity. For centuries and even now people believed false things, and as science advances they are shown that way. In a few months It will be shown that I was right, and you are all blind. |
You don't get it.
It doesn't matter if you're right and we're wrong.
The fact that its on the offical Xbox Website means that if we are wrong, they are wrong too, and any other company like Sony or MS whose actually is using this information would be wrong as well. Do you think that MS would willingly choose less accurate tracker? Unlike you they actually make decisions, based on the performance that NPD reports.
I never said being confirmed by MS/approved to be on the sight is a sign of accuracy, because that alone is not. NPD is more accuracte then VGC by the methods they use to collect data and make estimates. Even if VGC charts had exact numbers, NPD would still be more accuracte because its closer to the actual data.
"In a few months It will be shown that I was right, and you are all blind." also these are the words of a paranoid schizophrenic.
Moderated,
-Mr Khan
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
