By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azerth said:
Sony was. Ms has acted faster to change what they did while it took Sony a lot longer to do anything

Considering the following facts I think that claim is invalid:

PS3 price cut took approximately a year, from 500 to 400, there was a 599 model but also a 499$ model release at the same time.

X1 price cut took approximately half a year from 500 to 400.

However, the X1 teardown reveals that it costs 470-480 to produce with the kinect, the PS3 cost 800$ to produce.

Therefore, Sony had the retail cost at 400$ less then the manufacturing price vs 100$ less then manufacturing price in half the time, 200$ vs 100$ in the same time period.

Not to mention, BC and the Cell were a lot more of a commitment then the Kinect, which was launched as a nonessential peripheral.

 

Furthermore, Sony had no idea what would happen in the future, while MS has the benefit of hindsight.

 

So thats not a valid reason because of the different contexts.



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank