I think a lot of us don't understand the meaning of "competition"

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

mine said:

Wii Sports is one of the BEST SELLING games of ALL TIMES. It can't be praised enough and it should be seens on the same level as TETRIS as what it archived for the games industrie: getting people to play games which never tought of doing so.

That's funny I thought sales don't matter.

mine said:
As a Wii U owner I'm interested in having a stable eco system which makes it viable to create and release games for.

I don't care if the PS4 or XOne sells better if most of their games lack innovation on all levels.

The Wii U is the single one console available today which offers the broadest kind of controllers. This alone will enable new gameplay and fresh experiences. It says alot about the current state of the games industry that there nodoby is trying hard enough to make a fortune out of it...

 

mine said:

Sports rivals doesn't come close. It might be a unique experience thanks to Kinect - BUT it doesn't have the same level of accessibilty AND "masterbility" of a Wii Sports Club. 

I assume you've played KSR then? That game doesn't even have a learning curve to pick up and play. try again

 

Innovation is just a buzz-word. For simpletons who don't want to understand what good gameplay mechanics are. It just means new things.

DLC, Microtransactions, On-Disc DLC, Always Online Console DRM all of that are innovations to. New does not equal good, Innovative does not equal good.

I thought we play games, not controllers. From a purely games standpoint, the only game I would get would be Smash 4. Hell I play, brawl with a Game Cube controller. Nobody asked for such pointless innovations, thats why the core are going back to PlayStation, they are the only console company that realized that gamers have basically been ignored last gen and this gen by the other 2 manufacturers.