I think a lot of us don't understand the meaning of "competition"

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

Mr Puggsly said:

It looks like I struck a nerve. Somebody clearly got upset.

Are you pretending there are no core games on the 360? Maybe you should explore the 360 library a little more. It actually has hundreds of core games, many of the same noteworthy titles found on its main competitor.

Does it matter how much time I spent with Kinect? I actually own numerious Kinect games, but I primarily spent my time with 360 playing core games.

I can tell you're upset because you're talking nonsense. Simmer down buddy, its just video games.

Regardless of what MS did with the Kinect, the 360 is a well supported system still getting games in 2014. If we are speaking freely, I don't think the Kinect on 360 was even a bad idea seeing as the Xbox was practically the only console without gaming peripherals, sans remote, or alt controllers. They didn't force it and supported it well.

This time around its directly affecting the system especially in away that increases its entry price. Kinect has affected the XB1 such that even if it was unbundled, it will still have done its damage.

My only problem with the 360 was its peripheralization and live dependencies, dependencies that did not really exist much on the 360's predecessor, and that have saturated the 360's successor.