| impertinence said: I am glad we could come to an agreement. Thirdparties sometimes act irrationally when dealing with the Wii U. According to your formula that proves that there are third parties with a Nintendo bias. Not sure why we had to argue for a whole two pages when I was right all along? |
That's because we are arguing about two related but distinct things.
You are concerned with the existence of bias.
I'm concerned with the objectively proving the scale of the bias, which already assumes that it exists.
Furthermore, it has occured to me after some thought that my method is flawed because while I have defined what significant is in terms of the discussion, I havent defined at what marketshare the determination is based on. Which means its up for interpretation or subjective, which means that the entire method cannot be objective.
Ultimately, subjectivity is the main issue when talking about human nature.
Most of the reasoning I see in this forum is not rigorous enough.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
