Godsmurf said:
Your arguments care little about logic or facts. 1. Kyoto, if implemented, does reduce CO2. If the reduction is not enough, which indeed it isn't, then we need more reduction. 2. The CO2 emmission per capita was 3.2 metric tons for China and 1.19 for India in 2003 (most recent figures). It was 19.8 for the USA. It was not unreasonable to exempt developing countries that now pollute 5 to 15 times LESS than the USA, but these countries will be included in the next treaty. 3. Europeans bemoan the US for being the world's biggest polluter and contributor to global warming yet refusing to participate in the effort to avert a global disaster. This is pure freeloading behaviour, and discourages the whole world from making a big effort. The USA 's CO2 emmission per capita is more than DOUBLE the EU average. In the ranking of economies by CO2 efficiency (GDP / emmission) the top 8 countries are all European while the USA ranks 39th with a ratio of 2.1 compared to a EU average of 3.8 . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ratio_of_GDP_to_carbon_dioxide_emissions |
Firstly, do not cite Wikipedia as supportive of facts. It often fails in that regard.
1. If implemented, Kyoto would reduce CO2 levels by a whopping 5.2%:
"Even if the Protocol were implemented by all parties to the Kyoto conference, it would result in a just a 5.2% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions below 1990 levels, reducing anthropogenic emissions from around 7.2 billions tons per year to about 6.8 billion tons per year. From an environmental standpoint, this agreement falls woefully short of measures needed to head off the warming of the earth."
http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/kyoto.htm
Of course, this is because China and India and other developing countires are unaffected. Kyoto is flawed because of that. If we want an agreement, we should go back to the drawing board and include all countries, since pollution in China is still pollution.
2. This doesn't matter in the least since the U.S. will not be increasing its pollution output significantly in the near future, but China and India will.
3. Europeans committed to Kyoto pollution-reduction levels and haven't met them, simple as that. The U.S., more honestly, didn't agree to a reduction and then just ignore the promise when the going got tough.
The bottom line is that Kyoto is a deeply flawed agreement that will never be agreed to by the U.S. Since the U.S. is essential to include in any agreement on this subject to have a real effect, going back to the drawing board and scrapping Kyoto is the logical option.
In Memoriam RVW Jr.
SSBB Friend Code = 5455-9050-8670 (PM me if you add so I can add you!)
Tetris Party Friend Code = 116129046416 (ditto)