Why is Titanfall Considered a Big Exclusive for XB1 but FFXIV not for PS4?

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

Goatseye said:

dmitrijs88 said:

RolStoppable said:
Titanfall is a game that people want to play (goes for both, Xbox and PlayStation fans) while Final Fantasy XIV is a game that people don't want to play (goes for both, PlayStation and Xbox fans).

Final Fantasy XIV was met with a collective "yawn" ever since its announcement as an MMORPG.

wow, comparing some generic cheap ass shooter with best mmorpg in past years.

wow, comparing some generic cheap ass mmorpg with best shooter in past years.

J_Allard said:

dmitrijs88 said:

wow, comparing some generic cheap ass shooter with best mmorpg in past years.

Isn't it great how opinions work?

Can't get any more generic than Final Fantasy 100 to me.

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

How would you know that the average consumer considers Metacritic as the main judgement of their own personal view of quality. Its completly arbitrary, and it artificially qualifies games based on someone elses opinion. Even in the movie industry, its common for the fans and the critics to disagree, critical acclaim is just a buzz word.

An RPG/Open World gamer would have a vastly different list then someone who prefers FPSes. If you switched there lists, it             would be absolutely worthless to either of them.

All Metacritic is in an aggregate of "expert" and fan reviews. Its just a more complicated version of the previous example. If your going to make a list it is only valid if it is objective, once you start qualifying it becomes useless to any consumer whose prefrences didn't match the reviewer's.