tehsage on 22 March 2008
"Criticisms for Ocarina of Time started to appear only on the game's re-releases, with reviews for Master Quest and the Virtual Console version considering the graphics and sound technologies outdated.[50] For those reasons, after originally giving a rating of 10/10, IGN gave Master Quest 9/10[51] and GameSpot gave the Virtual Console release 8.9/10. "
I'm confused on how people could re-rate this game when the virtual console release was just a release of the original game. Was GameSpot expecting better graphics or sound techonologies of a game that was just meant to be a copy of the original?
