[Staff] The gamrConnect Community and How We View Avatars and Signatures

[Ganoncrotch]

gergroy said:
Honestly, i think that the sigs should probably have more leeway because we can turn those off so we cant see them. However, the avatars are ridiculous, and it amazes me that people are complaining they cant have half naked people as their avatar.

So, my suggestion to the mods is if somebody has a problem with cracking down on the nsfw avatars, just tell them to move it to theirs sigs. That way, people that use tablets or cant install ad block on their work computers (like myself) dont have to worry about nsfw stuff showing up. Simple, easy, and should be enough to make everybody happy!

But that is the thing... they can be turned off, like if you happen to spend a bit of time here and go changing from the default settings. Do you really want the site to have straight up porn visible in sigs if people happen to wander into a thread while they're not logged in or for new members to think that the place is just coated in that stuff but it can be made hidden? It says in the OP that the rule is there to make the place more accessable to everyone, forcing the NSFW stuff into the faces of new members or casual browsers with no account is the complete oppisite of this.