jlmurph2 said:
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
jlmurph2 said:
Tell me, what were their expectations on a 4 million install base? Because either way EA made a ton of money since its well known that they didn't give Respawn shit for resources (reason for no single player). They were doing nothing but setting a base in the beginning of a generation like COD 2 did and plan to blow up when the install bases are larger. EA does not brag like Sony does for every time they sell a million of something. They sit back and collect.
|
Wow...Ok.
Don't confuse EA for MS. I'm sure they didn't want to sell only a 4 million install base when there is a 6 million install base on the other side, but they had already taken MS money. I'm sure they are more concerned with how TF did on PC and how it will do on the 360. If they can outsell Ghosts on the 360 it will be a win for them.
@Italics: That's quite the speculation, surely you have a link for this common knowledge. I mean its not like EA is publishing the...oh wait never mind.
Fact is EA knows how much they lost, and there is no benefit for them to have been "exclusive" to Xb1, is more of Respawn's choice since they wanted to make a game for a single platform first. Why in the hell would EA care about selling XB1s when there are 86+ million that they could've sold to as well? They can't even compete with COD with this model.
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tboNpO0_2QU @2:15
|
Are you sure that video is relevant? the comment I was replying to was concerning the allegation that EA doesn't like to brag (but they love to crack jokes at Nintendo), and Sony does. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that EA is a multiplat and burning bridges with the market leader by bragging about the sales you got on the competiting platform is insanity?
Clearly,that's not best for business.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
