Soundwave said:
curl-6 said:
Soundwave said:
There's always a degree of serendipity when anything is that successful.
Michael Jackson's Thriller is a miracle. So is James Cameron's Titanic. So is TV's Seinfeld.
Of course these things were deliberate in their design, but to the degree that they are embraced by the public requires a certain amount of timing and (sure) luck.
Because otherwise you should be able to make a hit product everytime just by execution and that's not always the way things work.
Michael Jackson tried his damndest to top Thriller multiple times but never could do it, because it's not that f*cking easy, lol. I think that's one thing Nintendo fans don't get, you can't just pull a Wiimote type idea out of your ass every 5 years, that's not how basic creativity works. That's an idea that comes around maybe once every 20 years.
Not even Apple is capable of doing that ... they had an incredible streak with the iPod, iPhone, iPad, but since then haven't been able to come up with a new idea as strong as that ... because it's *difficult* to do (you think they haven't invested billions in trying to find the next big thing?).
|
Like I said though, Wii was successful cos it was in touch with the market. Wii U is flopping because it's out of touch.
I'm not saying they could easily have had another Wii megahit, but they could easily have had a solid 50-60m selling system.
|
If they had some kind of unbelievable new controller idea sure. But the Wii U as is ... even if they marketed it perfectly and named perfectly it wouldn't sniff 50-60 million.
The entire concept of the Wii brand is that it's about new controller interfaces that are so unique that people go crazy over them after playing for just a few minutes.
|
They could have simply made it a PS4 with both Wiimote and pro controller support, stocked up their studios during the Wii days to prevent software delays/droughts, named it better, and marketed it better, and it could have been a surefire hit.