By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lt_dan_27 on 26 March 2014
Edit Thread
drkohler said:
lt_dan_27 said:
shikamaru317 said:
lt_dan_27 said:
With kinnect, I agree.

That's ridiculous, they'd be selling at a huge loss, much better to take 2nd place while making a profit. With Kinect they can compete decently at a $50 premium over PS4, and without Kinect they could be strong competition at $50 less than PS4.

The xbox one is way weaker than the ps4. Sorry, but the xbox one isn't worth the same as a ps4, even with kinect.

You just wait until MrXMedia is proven right   - At this time he (and his imaginary army of insiders) are babbling about 5TF DP in the SoC.

I know quite a few (hobby and serious) scientists who would gladly pay $500 for a Kinect2 alone with full pc driver support, Such a thing would cost around $10000 maybe two or three years ago. So if you talk about "value", then the value of a $500 XBox One is VERY consideravly higher than that of a $400 PS4. You just have to ask the right people


This makes no sense. As a gaming machine and device, the xbox one is not worth more than a ps4. The camera for the xbox one really isn't that expensive either. If these scientists wanted it for 500, and I'm not saying they don't because I've seen what's been done with the first kinnect, they'd be more paying for the drivers than the device itself.