inFAMOUS Second Son’s Retail Version Differences Compared To E3 2013 Trailer

[Dr.Henry_Killinger]

Nem said:

Dr.Henry_Killinger said:

Chevinator123 said:

Surprised at the responses, other sites quickly came to the conclusion that they cant be compared cause different time of day, 2014 pics are obviously compressed lower quality images ect ect

 

guess vgc isn't very smart

right on the money, they are probably only reading and responding to the OP which is misleading as fuck.

Luckily, VGC forums don't make that much of an impact on sales anyway.

You can probably say that without beeing insulting.

People don't pay attention unless you do just that.

Most people only pointed out the lighting took a hit. No one said anything like the textures look worse or something daft like that (regarding the picture resolution). Dispite the time of day, you can see they remodeled the faces a bit and that the lighting is not as impressive.

Really? Cause it sounds like you haven't read any of the posts in this thread...

BenVTrigger said:
Also are these both direct feed shots? Because retail looks noticeably blurrier, like its either sub 1080p or they downgraded the AA.

So far have any game reached their unveils on graphics? Ryse also got a pretty decent downgrade from what I remember and Watch Dogs looks nowhere near its official unveil.

That's an exception to the rule, you should have said most people rather than no one, cause you claim is invalidated.

Get off those high chairs before you fall from them and hurt yourselves.

You want to explain to me how this is a valid image comparison?

Because last time I checked, a screenshot of a 720p video does not magically become 1080p. Comparison of Shadows should be under the same lightning conditions.

Get real, this comparison is bull shit and you know it.