| Einsam_Delphin said: I wouldn't be mad, I'd be sad that Nintendo's gonna lose even more money after this thing sells even worse than the Wii U. I mean really, other than sell worse, the only other thing this does different from Wii U is change third party reasoning for not putting games on the system to it's install base compared to PS4/X1 rather than it's specs. |
Waive the licensing fees for the first year. That would get a lot of attention from third parties if the system is basically a PC GPU. What's Nintendo really got to lose here anyway, they're not getting games like Kingdom Hearts III and FFXV on the Wii U as is, so waiving the devleopment fee or say dropping it to $0 on the first 400,000 copies of any game also gives third parties a very attraction option to explore. You're effectively making them want to sell more of the Nintendo version than any other version because they'd be making the most profit there.
That's a business model third parties can understand, the Wii U is one that makes no sense to them.
There is no conspiracy against Nintendo from third parties any more than the frustrated guy who can't get a girlfriend thinks women have a conspiracy against him. No dude, you don't have a girlfriend because you don't approach any girls, have bad personal hygiene, and expect women to come to you. Nintendo is that guy, the good news is there's nothing stopping that dude from fixing those issues, it just takes a slice of humble pie and a reality check that he is the one at fault, not the entire population of women.
