tastyshovelware said:
if by everyone was on board with the DC you mean sega, then yes. that system was dead from the start. also, the majority of all launches are sub par. look at the wii, you had twilight princess and....? of course hardcore gamers bought the ps2. by the fall of 01 (one year after launching in the US) it had: GT3, twisted metal black, ICO, and jak and daxter as 1st party published titles. so, the exclusive home (in most cases) of metal gear, gta, gt, final fantasy, virtua fighter, twisted metal, and devil may cry was considered secondary by 3rd party developers. yeah right. |
First, i think you should take a look about the post i replied to. Second, any of those points i made, aren't untrue. DC was the first in the market, so it was used, like 360, as a stepboard to next generation, ready to move on. GC had good 3rd party support from the start, with comparatively high-rated games, but it ended quickly because of its dissappointing sales. 3rd parties go where the money is, and it's hard to believe that they would deliberately choose the platform that is the hardest to develope for, unless there's more money to make that way. So it was their last choice by default. Yes, Wii had TP, but PS2 had nothing. So, looking at the attach rates, GC and Xbox really were the hardcore choices.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.







