By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
Zero999 said:

The onus is on you to convince me you're right and you're doing a terrible job at it.

WE ALREADY know that wii u is a financially viable console and has all the hardware it needs to get versions of multiplatforms. this isn't a discussion.

Well my first bit of proof will be in the form of The Caped Crusader.

1 Batman: Arkham City WiiU 2012 Action Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment 0.10 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.20
2 Batman: Arkham Origins WiiU 2013 Action Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.15

Followed by a distinct lack of Batman: Arkham Knight which is completely avoiding the Wii U.

Now this means one of two things - Either the Batman games on Wii U havent been successful or the Wii U isnt powerful enough to handle the game. There is one more elephant in the room though: The lack of PS3 and 360 versions of the game. Arkham Asylum, Arkham City and Arkham Origins all sold really well on PS360 (theyre all multi-million sellers), so the only real reason would be that the systems cant handle the title. The same would then also apply for Wii U.

 

1.Much of your walltext shows good proportions for wii u titles, especially the first example of batman AO. it's a game that decreased 50% over it's predecessor on the other consoles but is tracking ahead of arkham city on wii u even with advertising excluding the existence of the wii u version. it already sold enough to profit and got 5% of AO total console versions, with a 26x smaller installed base.

2.games from EA mean nothing.

3. you exclude titles that did well.

4. and most importantly, you aren't even adressing the topic's subject, wich is FF 15 and KH3 making more sense on wii u.