Zod95 said:
MDMAlliance said:
Except for the fact that the context of what you said doesn't change the fact that you're wrong about that statement. And the argument of "environment of exclusivity" is also wrong given that Nintendo's recent meeting pretty much outright told us they were considering using non-Nintendo hardware for games. Maybe not fully, but you seriously cannot expect that from any of the big 3.
Also, saying nothing is 100% accurate is just a scapegoat for you. "100% accuracy" here refers to things regarded as truths in history, and since there's little to no other interpretation of these historical facts that counter your absolute statements, I can pretty much say with "100% accuracy" that you're wrong.
You're saying I'm being picky but I'm actually not at all. I pointed out MANY things in your OP that were wrong. I actually could have picked out a LOT more if I were trying to be picky. In reality, you're just deluded, not us.
|
You are again circling around the issue instead of going right to the point. You are yet to prove that this part of the OP is a lie:
"Not letting any of their games to be launched out of their consoles (not even on PC) was a way to tell the consumer that, no matter what, Nintendo games will ever only be played on Nintendo consoles."
The argument continues to be valid even with the examples of seiya19 and S.Peelman, which haven't "saved" you at all.
|
You say I am circling the issue rather than going right to the point. However, we have already showed the evidence that Nintendo has let two of their franchises release on PC (a separate system) and they have even said in their recent meeting that they were open to using their IP's on smart phones, even maybe for games. http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/140130/03.html Here is a place to go as proof.
