kirby007 said:
F0X said:
kirby007 said:
F0X said:
kirby007 said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
I'd pick SNES. It's arguably the best console ever made. Great controller, great durable hardware, and a software library for the ages. N64 is a great console, and probably my personal favorite, but SNES is the better system.
Also, I disagree with the inflammatory language in the OP. Disregarding three generations of platform development as "fancy rehashes" or "casual crap" doesn't help your credibility. |
I might have worded it better but what gc/wii/wii u was actually as refreshing as ario 64 or banjo kazooi or OoT
wii: motioncontrols didn't add enough
|
There's no reasonable way to one up the birth of 3D gaming as we know it in terms of innovation, but you're not going to hear me say that one of Nintendo's least successful consoles is somehow the best of them all. It can also be argued that NES has an equal amount, if not more, innovative gaming experiences for its time while also dominating the industry.
|
sales =/=quality
|
Then provide an alternative measurement of quality and let me explain to you how subjective and possibly arbitrary it is.
|
i can't, It will allways be subjective, but sales isn't a good measure staff either
|
Good, good. Now we're getting somewhere. The problem with threads like these (X is better than Y, or X is best) is how easily people forget that "better" and "best" are subjective terms. There may be some objective measurements of qualty (hardware capabilities, sales, ect.), but they are not the be all end all in determining superiority- at least on a person-by-person basis.
Point is, I'm not saying you're wrong. I just want to know where your standards lie.
