spemanig said:
the_dengle said:
spemanig said:
I don't agree. Take Two may be "big," but it's nowhere near Nintendo. For every GTA V, Nintendo sells 5 Pokemons. After a certain price, it makes little sence not to allow Nintendo to buy them. Activision already might. I say, beat them to the punch, and hard. And there's no reason why they shouldn't buy Capcom.
|
Please tell me you're joking.
|
Did you even read what you yourself bolded? How many Pokemon games did Nintendo sell between GTA IV and GTA V? Five! How much have they sold combined? Over 50 million. AND developement costed less, so they make more profit per unit. So they sell at least as much as Take-Two's biggest IP in the same amount of time with a higher profit margin? AND they have other IP's that simply make more than any other Take-Two IP.
|
You constructed the sentence incorrectly if that's the point you were trying to convey. Nintendo does not profit more per unit. The words you're looking for is that the individual budgets are much lower (which is then countered by it selling 3-10x the numbers of a normal Pokemon game), the games themselves are also cheaper, so you have to consider that as well.
Arguing against the monumental sales and cash brought in by GTA4 and GTA5 is very tough to do. At least you're trying.
