CVG: "Nintendo was dead to us very quickly" after the Wii U, says EA source

[green_sky]

pezus said:

green_sky said:

pezus said: Probably not, but ME1 and 2 360 combined surely cost less than ME2 PS3 did alone.

ME2 on PS3 came with all the dlc packs for the game. Also it was upgraded to run on ME3 engine, so you could even some slight graphical enhancements (minor). Also helped that the game dropped to under $20 just months after on a much larger install base. 

They weren't real advancements though and the framerate was bad. ME3's port was even worse. I've played it myself for a few hours so I'm not talking out of my ass. I had to stop due to the framerate and tearing being terrible. It still sold well. Lots of other cases like these, like Bayonetta which was one of the worst PS3 ports ever, yet sold quite a lot. Also The Orange Box, another bad port that sold well.

The fact is, I think, that most consumers don't really know if a game is worse on one platform than the other. Most consumers don't visit Eurogamer and read Digital Foundry articles. They just buy what interests them and Nintendo console owners don't seem as interested in most big 3rd party games as PSXbox owners are.

Damn you Pezus for taking pot shots at PS3 versions of games. Also implying that ps3 gamers have bad taste and keep on buying shitty ports. 

Second paragraph is something i can agree with and have been trying to convey to PlayStationLegend, who is a new user here.