Why the hell does the Internet have a vendetta against Nintendo?

[osed125]

Aerys said:

osed125 said:

Sony posts $312 Million Loss, Playstation Stagnant: 1126 comments 

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/02/sony-posts-312-million-loss-playstation-stagnant

I can go on, but in any case, why is selling a building or closing a studio not as impotant as not making forecasts? I also added the 'junk' status above.

You should read sometimes before answer . It's obvious than selling a studio is not a big deal when you buy bigger one, same for building -_- , when i sell my house to get enough money to buy a bigger house, i'm in more trouble ? I dont think so.

again, you should read, the most important point is : It's normal to be more shocked by the Titan fall, same thing happened to Sony after PS2 generation, becoming the loser of the new generation when you were the king of last generation is currently something people want to talk about.

Look for threads on VGC, Neogaf or 4Chan about the bold topic. I'm pretty sure you won't find even half of those threads as Nintendo threads in the last couple of days.

What people here don't understand is that (for the most part) Nintendo fans are not against criticism, but the amount of it is just ridiculously.

As for your other post: 

Forbes on PlayStation Vita: 'Sony in Big Trouble':  1733 comments
3DS, PSP Dominate Japan While Vita Still Struggles: 510 comments 

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/04/18/3ds-psp-dominate-japan-while-vita-still-struggles

http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/12/30/forbes-on-playstation-vita-sony-in-big-trouble

Btw, the reason I'm using IGN is because: 1) is basically the most popular site on the web in terms of gaming news, 2) All of this are just news, looking at the comments give us a nice perspective on what gamers find enjoyment in talking.

As a site note, IGN never reported the 95k Vita units sold on the December NPD, which is a pretty big deal and gamres should make note about it.