Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Aerys]

Pristine20 said:

Aerys said:

Pristine20 said:

curl-6 said:

Mythmaker1 said:

curl-6 said:

Mythmaker1 said:

Fair enough. So what is it about Nintendo games, in particular, that is bestest? :P

Prioritization of fun, cleverly designed, and creative gameplay above all else.

They have that in spades, for the most part.

The point I diverge on is the prioritization of fun. I crave a fun game from time to time, but I often look for the maturity and depth I mentioned earlier, and not as many of their games have as much of that.

For me, everything takes a back seat to fun. Maturity in games is like CGI in movies; it can be a good addition, but also a drawback, and isn't always necessary.

"Fun" is a term that has really been hijacked by the ninty crowd.  Fun = enjoyment so pretty much any game is fun noone would be playing it. As such, all games that have seen a release are probably fun to someone. It's not a ninty-exclusive like some of you seem to infer.

Pretty much this, this is why Sony is at least as much important than Nintendo, they have more variety, mature games, creative( Puppeter is surely the most creative game of the year) and fun games

I would disagree that Sony is as important as nintendo. No other VG company has as many die hard fans as nintendo...that one is for sure.

I cant deny this...Not only on VG, but all over the world, worst on french forums when i read common things like "  gaming is dead with Wii U, rip " and so much hate against PS4 from Nintendo fans because of the sales