Mythmaker1 on 11 January 2014
osed125 said:
Mythmaker1 said:
Mario is probably the only one that really sticks, but I think a lot of the way other publishers neglect the genre is because Mario has a stranglehold on it. Everyone knows you can't compete with Mario, so no one tries. Yet look at all of the indie-platforming games that have flooded the market in recent years, outside of that competition. For a couple of years, there might be a void, but I don't expect it would have serious long-term consequences. It's sort of like World of Warcraft. If WoW fell tomorrow, just about every company would leap at the chance to take its place.
|
if that's the case, you can say that for absolutely every game in existence, or hardware for that matter.
Say Sony stops making consoles and after a void, Apple, Samsung, Google or whatever comes with another console. If that's your perception of something not being important then anything is not important in life, because practically everything can be replaced.
|
That was more or less the point. That there isn't anything that makes Nintendo immune to that.
I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.