By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaizar on 10 January 2014
Edit Thread
SvennoJ said:

After previous decline in 3D: http://www.screendigest.com/news/2013_08_summer_2013_titles_fail_to_thrive_on_3d_screens/view.html
Gravity might simply be an exception: http://variety.com/2013/film/news/box-office-gets-a-boost-from-older-audiences-seeing-gravity-in-3d-1200721603/
A new blue ocean for 3D, but will they come back for more 3D?

And nobody is watching 47 Ronin at all
http://variety.com/2013/film/news/47-ronin-box-office-bomb-1201012170/

Anyway 3D movies are still $3 more expensive here: $13.99 vs $10.99, IMAX 3D $19.49. And it's not even a 4K projector, still the old dual 2K digital IMAX setup. Screw that.
3D percentage still has more to do with the availability of both. 2D screenings are held back since 3D makes the theater more money.


My local theater that gives discounts 7 days a week for Mantinee & students, has 5 3D XTREME (IMAX imitation with 4K digital projectors) showings, and 3 regular 3D showings and 2 2D showings, and Gravity was the same way during the same number of weeks in Box Office, at this local theater.

To many movies came out in December 25 and 47 Ronin doesn't look like it can offer people something they haven't already seen.

I'm curious on how Legend of Hercules & Seventh Son (comic book) will do.

I think the comic book movie "I' Frankenstein" will do good, if not great in the box office. I personally want to see this 3D movie so much.

The ticket price depends on the theater, for example Rave charges the same for 2D & 3D now, but AMC is still $4 more for 3D.

I hope all the other Theaters in America fulfil their promise they made about reduces 3D ticket prices to match 2D ticket prices. They were suppose to all do this in 2013, but some still haven't done it yet.