| Dark_Feanor said: Obs 1: I´m not dishing the quality of any of the following products. Obs 2: Sony´s case is not unique. Obs 3: Diversity in some cases might be good for a companie. Obs 4: I simplified much of my original post, it was a little complicated to follow. ********************************************* So, do you want to stream old/nostalgic games? You can buy a Bravia TV, or a PS4, or a PS3, or a Vita TV... Want a entertainment hub? You can buy a Bravia TV, or a PS4, or a PS3, or a Vita TV... Want mobile games and entertainment?
Choose between a PS Vita or Xperia smartphone (that also stream games).
***************************************************
Bonus question: Does the PS4 output better image quality to a Bravia screen?
|
I honestly don't see what you're getting at. The way you're describing it, it sounds like this is perfect synchronization between devices. Someone who wants an xperia smartphone (the play is outdated, so no one is buying them as a gaming device) won't get a vita instead, and vice versa. I don't understand why you keep mentioning bravie either. They're kinda just there. But I really, and I mean really want you to answer this honestly. Do you think a person whose considering getting a ps4 is going to say "No, I'll just go with a vita tv instead." OR do you think it that someone whose going to buy a vitatv is really going to think "Nah, I can afford 4 times the cost." The only competition is for people who are first time buyers of a console, and have to choose between a ps3 and ps4.
