Nintendo needs to take a lesson from Disney (and some ideas).

[S.T.A.G.E.]

okr said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:
You're the one who chose to make an argument to cut down Sony when technically you're both right. Sony largely had a third party fleet and they had great first party as well. Problem is it was swallowed up by the variety of third party. He was right, Sony did have something for everyone, which is something Nintendo needs once more.

I would agree if you wouldn't always claim that Nintendo "needs" this or that. Financially they don't need to expand on their portfolio. If you had said instead you wished Nintendo would create (or would let create) more new IPs which are different from their existing ones (like they did with Xenoblade),  I'd agree.

They need a western development talent to replace Rare. Rare was the exact opposite of what Nintendo was and spoke to a different market, making Nintendo a viable option to many, but theres just the diehard like today with the Wii U (because those non-gamers certainly haven't stuck around).  They need profitable games. No doubt Nintendo will have some classics this gen, but will they be profitable? I hope so, but I would bank on it not being that successful. As I stated before the fix for Nintendo is to create quick defector. Monolith cannot help them, Bayonetta cannot help them and most Japanese companies cannot. Konami is too busy with the MGS5 isnt even on the Wii U and Castlevania: LOS2 isn't even hitting the WIi U. They need some western development to make second party because even as strong as those games are they aren't touching the Wii U.