S.Peelman said:
prayformojo said:
EricFabian said:
prayformojo said:
PandaGames said:
Sells nicely in Japan, but Europe is way to low.
America isn't that bad, it should atleasy have 200K.
I hope the next chart gets atleast: -A: 200k E: 100K J: 100k
|
You can't count the 3DS since it's a handheld so the Wii-U IS top five.
|
yes we can. 3DS play games, is a game device and... play games. So we can count
|
Interesting. So if all the device has to do is play games, shouldn't we count iPhone? It plays games and is a gaming device? Oh, wait, we DON'T count them? Why? Because it's a seperate market? But...IT PLAYS GAAAAAMMMEEES!!
Seriously though, they don't compete and never have. Take a look at the first bar graph on this website. Notice how they seperate the totals? Do you know why they do that? Because handhelds and consoles are seperate markets and don't directly compete. They sell to a completely different demograph and are drastically cheaper to buy. If YOU want to incorrectly lump them in together, you'd better add iPhone and Galaxy sales as well since they're portable gaming devices.
|
Dude, you know this continuing debate of yours is getting extremely annoying? In every thread that somehow mentions the words 'console', 'handheld' and 'sales' this is the only thing you have to say.
Handhelds play games, ergo that can be compared to home-consoles if someone wants to. They can also be compared as a seperate group if one wants to.
The end.
|
I will continue to do so every time I see some kid try an compare the two. They've never competed for sales and have never been in the same market (even the website we are having this argument on, seperates them via bar graphs lol) and to do so is ignorant beyond comprehension. If handhelds and consoles are the same market, then motorcycles and cars are in the same market.
Hint? They're not.
