oniyide said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
curl-6 said:
| S.T.A.G.E. said:
Its the same damn game. Nintendos the only company forcing them to up-port and down-port. Why cant Nintendo just let them port a game smoothly? The profits must match the investment of the game itself.
|
They didn't have to down-port or up-port to bring Black Ops 2 and Ghosts to Wii U. And since Ghosts was made, clearly Black Ops 2 turned a profit on Wii U.
|
There is NO excuse. Now I am seeing why they might have cut DLC. If the game doesn't meet the specific amount the expected percentage of people who buy DLC are half or less so on the Wii U there technically is no point. You guys have helped me understand the dilema entirely.
|
the thing is its not even a Wii U thing. Last i checked only 1/3 of people actually buy DLC for any given game. Across the board. So imagine how much would get it for wii U? what some dont want to understand is we have no idea how Ninty runs their online behind close doors, I know they charged crazy fees for games and whatnot back on WiiWare and they didnt let sales and stuff like that. Maybe its still the case, maybe they are just the worst to deal with in terms of online and if only a handful of people will support DLC its not worth it to put it on the store that accounts for less than 1 percent of sales, but naw Acti is evil
|
Exactly, why would they give the Wii U version DLC if the expectation is low based on sales? If you asked western third party who was the hardest company to crack as far as a partnership it would be Nintendo.
