By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ninetailschris said:
Mr Khan said:
outlawauron said:
badgenome said:
No, because it's Duck Dynasty not Dick Dynasty.

That would certainly reverse the sides which everyone just changing the for and against.

Except that gays are not necessarily hateful, homophobes are.


If you define everyone who doesn't agree with homosexuality as homophobe then your point is necessarily wrong because there is no proof to show. There are many people who don't agree yet haven't been hateful or anything close to it.

http://www.gq.com/entertainment/television/201401/duck-dynasty-phil-robertson?currentPage=1

I suggest everyone actual read the article to see what he actually said.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but it didn't seem to me like he was saying everyone who disagreed with homosexuality were homophobes.  Those who arbitrarily damn an entire segment of the population based upon a 2000+ year old fantasy novel however, are.

For example, I'm not a homosexual, but I don't even consider that any love I feel is more 'pure' than theirs, and there's simply no empirical evidence to suggest that what they're doing is wrong in any way shape or form.  They can still retain the services of a surrogate to have children (and guess what, so do some religious folks, just so they don't have to go through the hardship of being pregnant).