Einsam_Delphin said:
But they didn't advertise it. Why would they advertise something they're not selling, that even if they did sell, no one would buy. It's just a tech demo. You only have yourself to blame for thinking anything more of it. And are you really trying to say that this game is somehow a bad thing? I only see nothing but positives here. It shows Nintendo is still trying to keep it's 3rd party relations positive, it's another game for the Wii U, Zelda series finally does something different from the usual action/adventure, and Zelda will gain more interest from Japan while Dynasty Warriors gains more from the West. Everybody wins! |
Um...that was an advertisement for what Zelda would truly look like. Its just in the art style of Twilight Princess powered by the Wii U tech. That game is not technically demanding. It's old news that that is very possible for the Wii U.
Watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAmKqtAu-hY
You can take it as what you will but I find the GC era to be one of the darker times for Nintendo. The Wii U is ,mirroring it in spades. I am not trying to bring you down or change your opinion. This is just my assessment based on history. One thing most people undermine is that some people on this site were huge Nintendo fans before they moved on and mistaken skepticism for as wishing ill on the brand. Couldn't be any further from the truth.







