Why didn't Big 3rd Parties give Vita the B.O.T.D.?

[forevercloud3000]

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Well... to be fair... EA, Activision, Ubisoft and the rest are not giving 3ds much support either in terms of third party and it has an amazing install base... They just don't like handhelds... Heck Activision and Ubisoft gave more support to the vita than the 3ds...

The 3ds does have more support from japanese developers but I doubt that if the install base wasn't there, they wouldnt give any support to it as well...

And either ways... the Vita has remote play... what else does it need? /s

You make a strong point about the Western big publishers. Yet lets talk of the big Japanese ones, SE in particular. SE signed on to do several big 3DS titles before we even knew how it was going to sell. KH 3D and Bravely Default were in the pipeline. Where were these level caliber games for Vita? If we are going to go by how DS and PSP games performed, every SE title did about equal or better on PSP than it's direct DS counterpart. Why not do more of the same for Vita? Instead of stuff like that Vita got Army of Hell from SE................wtf?  Not saying that was a terrible game, but it wasn't exactly what people were expecting and or hoping from SE on Vita. Most of the most desired games from them.......are already made. KH BBS HD Vita version and FF Type-0 Vita release.

The no love for Vita, even at this point from SE, the company who probably stands to be the MOST successful on the console is baffling. It just continues my thoughts that someone at SE no longer likes Sony and spites them at every opportunity it seems >_>