Why are some Nintendo fans so opposed to going third party?

[KungKras]

Purple said:

KungKras said:
Tell me, OP, how do you justify MS or Sony's continued existence in the console market?

One of them leaving is a much more compelling prospect.

I actually think they're both awful for the video game market, running their gaming divisions at a massive loss puts off other companies from getting into the industry and leaves us consumers stuck with a duopoly. In this position they've been able to fleece the consumer with pay for online, DLC and pay to play practices on full priced games and consumers haven't had a viable alternative to turn to. 

But I don't care about Sony or Microsoft. I'm more just interested in why people are so against Nintendo going third party. And I'll post this again because people seem incapable of reading my posts, I'm not advocating going third party. I just want to know why people are against the idea. For me it's the more innovative control methods Nintendo consoles have.

I see. I agree fully with the bold part.

Why I'm against Nintendo going third party is that the entire philosophy that consoles used to have, with the SNES and consoles like that, would die. There needs to be a manufacturer that remembers that consoles are consoles.

If Nintendo left, I'd have no interest in console gaming what so ever, because console gaming would not be able to offer me anything worthwhile over PC gaming.