padib said:
| farlaff said:
If by "people doing the same as if they were still 8" means playing great quality games, count me in. Sega made games by that time but now their situation is almost irrelevant as to what it was in the past. Same goes for Konami (my personal favourite growing old) - which today only relies on football and one or other good game - Square, Capcom and others, to talk about the ones that could go on (Acclaim died, THQ died and so forth. Plus, I think you meant to say "keep on" instead of "carry on").
Not Nintendo! They kept releasing incredible games since the time I was 8. For the more "mature" games that people insist in saying are for the ones who grew old (and usually teens say that) , I can always use my PC, thank you.
The fact that, aesthetically, some games Nintendo develops look kiddy has nothing to do with the experience. But you can always suit yourself to not liking them. I respectfully think its your loss.
|
You are in the minority, and it's not only his loss, it's the loss of a large majority, a majority that means money for Nintendo, money they are losing. So in the end, it's also very much Nintendo's loss.
@OP. The NeoGeo was unaffordable. Look into vg history and you'll see why the Neo Geo failed. Imho the WiiU's price is also too high, but nothing compared to the unaffordable Neo Geo.
|
Thanks for the comment. I think you are so right about it.
As to NeoGeo, I was using it as a kind of absurd comparison and intended to mean just what you said. Sorry for any confusion.
