fps_d0minat0r said:
There are some people that carry on doing what they used to do when they were 8 years old, but most people change. Sony and MS offer games for a much wider audience than nintendo do so its natural they can expect more sales. MS on one hand have kinectimals while on the other have gears of war. Sony range from littlebigplanet to god of war I know nintendo are trying to broaden their demographic, with games like zombieU & bayonetta, but why would they pick that game to do it when it couldnt even manage 2m sales on ps360? and 1 game a year isnt going to cut it, they need 2-3 hardcore exclusives every year to raise a level of expectation from consumers that it wont only be making kiddy games anymore. |
If by "people doing the same as if they were still 8" means playing great quality games, count me in. Sega made games by that time but now their situation is almost irrelevant as to what it was in the past. Same goes for Konami (my personal favourite growing old) - which today only relies on football and one or other good game - Square, Capcom and others, to talk about the ones that could go on (Acclaim died, THQ died and so forth. Plus, I think you meant to say "keep on" instead of "carry on").
Not Nintendo! They kept releasing incredible games since the time I was 8. For the more "mature" games that people insist in saying are for the ones who grew old (and usually teens say that) , I can always use my PC, thank you.
The fact that, aesthetically, some games Nintendo develops look kiddy has nothing to do with the experience. But you can always suit yourself to not liking them. I respectfully think its your loss.
My 1000th post: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9368779
