By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ListerOfSmeg on 27 October 2013
Edit Thread
JayWood2010 said:
ListerOfSmeg said:
JayWood2010 said:


Depends on how you say it which is why i said make a judgement call.  It is pretty obvious when somebody is using the word bias as a synonym to fanboy but because people can get away with it they do as you can with many rules right now.  

The truth is, people who want to get around the rule book can do so easily.  VGC creates a smarter version of a troll

So then they could ban people just because they do not like them while allowing the people they do like to use it whenever they want. Sounds pretty biased to me.

Technically most rules are judgement calls right now.  So couldn't they already do that?

In fact some users actually have mod protection right now like Rol for example.


Yeah and I really think that needs to change. I say someone is acting childish I get banned. Another user says I am stupid and nothing happens to them except I get banned for replying to them in the same manner they didnt get banned for.

Then I got banned the other day because some people called me biased and I stated my opinion without insulting anyone or any company. I was banned but then unbanned. I just came to the site and was logged out but when I logged in I didnt get the banned message. Then another time I got banned for saying I thought Nintendo had a better E3 and the mod called it extreme trolling with no basis in reality. Like to them it was impossible for Sony to not win E3 and anyone that thought differently had no right to post here cause they were trolling.

 

I wasnt trying to call you out in my other post. Just trying to show how leaving it up to opinion can be a bad thing,

I think we need set rules and a group of people to review any bans made by mods to see if there is actually any merit. A citizens review board so to speak.