NightDragon83 on 13 October 2013
| Boutros said: 48 FPS makes CGI flaws stand out a lot more. I don't see it as being an improvement. |
Exactly. Imagine a movie like Avatar shot in 48fps (not to mention how much more it would cost being that you'd essentially be rendering DOUBLE the frames of what was originally rendered at 24fps)... it would look like one of those intentionally low budget and cheap flicks on Syfy channel.
On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.
