VD-Dev "pushing the 3DS to its limits"

[fatslob-:O]

JoeTheBro said:

fatslob-:O said:

JoeTheBro said:

fatslob-:O said:

@Bold Not comparable to the 3DS. Are you even reading ? -_-

Like I said the 3DS is more powerful and I stand by that statement, however that doesn't completely equate to having completely superior graphics since the 3DS sacrified a part of the graphics for better stereoscopic 3D performance. (I hope this statement clears up some things since I'm getting tired of repeating it over and over.) -_-

If your wondering why the 3DS can perform somewhat better in graphics it has to do with efficiency but like I said before the 3DS does not out the PSP completely.

There is no such thing as proofs. There is only evidence in the physical world. 

See this right here ? The 3DS still has to produce a left and right image while also producing another 2 frames for a black image on each eye. This time the shutter is located on the screen instead of the glass. Whether you need glasses or not you still have to put 4X the computational effort to produce 1 3D frame. 

3D doesn't take anything close to 4x the computational effort. It's actually between 1X and 2X depending on the technology.

Trust me, I'm an expert

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/3d-vision-surround-stereoscopic-gaming,2672-6.html

......right

FPS != computational effort. When you bundle two graphics cards do you have double the computational power? Basically. Do you have double the fps? Not really.

What part of "I'm an expert" don't you understand? I know this stuff man ;)

@Bold What does this have to do about the discussion of how computationally expensive a 3D frame is ? 

That's cause your likely not an expert at this stuff. ;)