Kaizar said:
fatslob-:O said:
happydolphin said:
| fatslob-:O said:
Once again if your trying to bait me I'm a PC gamer primarily so that won't work and it's there to warn you of assumptions about what someone prefers. Simple as what I said last time, then the PS3 has bad performance, period, no questions about whether it looks good or not, it just runs badly and that's how I see it. I'll ask you once again to ponder about what performance vs graphics means.
|
Let's see if I can surprise you.
Performance revolves more around frame-rate, screen tearing while Graphics revolves around textures, lighting, shadows, resolution, etc.
To close up my little inquisition on the PS3, since you say it has bad performance, would you say it is just a little better than a PSP and struggles to draw distances, because it drops frames?
Just so I understand where your dropped frames argument was leading us in the end.
|
Just so you know the PS3 and the 3DS are in different boats. The PS3 will destroy the PSP in terms of graphics even if it has bad performance and the problem with the 3DS is that it doesn't have enough power to out the PSP completely and once it does, it's not that big of a win since other things hinder it. Stereoscopic 3D is a resource hog and that is what will stop the 3DS from outdoing the PSP completely.
|
You can do a teardown of the 3DS, and it will reveal that the RAM is up to 384 MB (but it's rally only 128 MB), and that the CPU is 2-core 1.8 GHz (but it's really only 2-core 1.0 GHz).
So what does that tell U about the 3DS?
|
Once again you have no sources whereas that article I showed you is evidence.
