By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O on 10 October 2013
Edit Thread
F0X said:
JoeTheBro said:
F0X said:
JoeTheBro said:
F0X said:


Since JoeTheBro has conviced me that graphics are about technology, not looks, I must point out that the 3DS has a much higher pixel fillrate than the PSP, and can output a screen resolution 800x240. You're right in saying that in real-world, 2D gameplay scenarios, the 3DS won't obliterate the PSP. Honestly, I don't believe it'll get much better than Kid Icarus, running at 60 FPS with large draw distances and lots on onscreen action. But, you'd be wrong in saying that 3DS is as weak as PSP.

I did? I think you mistook my comments, unless you are still joking.


I'm pretty sure we debated over what counts as graphics in another thead. But yes, I was joking by grossly oversimplifying the conclusion we both came to at the time.

Well you simplified so much that you turned graphics into image quality!


Are you going to try and convice me that image quality can't be a part of a graphics discussion?

Both of you are having troubles of what graphics and performance means. While the 3DS is impressive in the performance department of trying to create stereoscopic 3D frames it lacks in the graphics department mainly because nintendo sacrificed graphics for stereoscopic 3D performance.