sc94597 said:
MDMAlliance said:
fatslob-:O said:
I say cut costs everywhere not just on social care but on everything that is a drain oh and the unemployment numbers are steadily growing so no more welfare.
|
Just wondering, are you saying you're fine with just cutting spending and, as a result, leaving many more problems politically for the sake of economics? I know many people don't know or understand, but there are many consequences to cutting in any department. The severity of the consequences vary, but cutting from everywhere will stir up a shit storm.
|
The cuts would be incremental, just as the increase in spending was/is incremental.
|
Just wondering... is it really possible to cut spending in a non-incremental way besides completely getting rid of it? What I say still stands, because he wanted to cut costs on everything. If you cut too little from everything, it does nothing. The only logical conclusion that a chunk would be taken off where it would be noticeable. If you do that, you create a big problem. Why do you think it's so hard to change our budget?
