Shin'en: If you can't make great looking games on Wii U, it's not the hardware's fault

[curl-6]

fatslob-:O said:

curl-6 said:

fatslob-:O said:
C'mon people, Neo Assault Nano doesn't look that impressive to me at all. I don't think it's doing anything cutting edge in the technical department. 720p ? Really ? Be honest with yourself, this isn't an impressive show case to what the WII U is capable of given the fact that it's an eshop title so I don't expect much from it. Hell even X looks more impressive to me than what they did.

60fps on two screens, (nearly 50% more pixels than just 720p) while doing techniques PS3/360 can't. That's better than anything Ubisoft have accomplished.

I'm not trying to bash the game but it just doesn't look impressive at all to showcase the WII U's power and plus there will be better titles than this in the WII U's lifetime. I don't know why your bringing ubisoft in this when this developer hasn't showcased anything much better themselves.

I agree that we will see much better in the system's life; it's a 82MB launch title made by 5 people, after all. But for the reasons I outlined in my last post, I think it makes better use of the hardware than Ubisoft's games so far.

It's slim pickings on Wii U as far as showcases go, as it's still early daysn for the system, so it's less a matter of "which is the best showcase" and more a matter of "what's the best we've seen so far, even if it's not exactly a showcase".

As for the bet, I'll put in my sig for 3 months: "fatslob-:O correctly predicted that Watch Dogs would be graphically better on Wii U than 360/PS3. He was right and I was wrong."
Deal?