Are gaming journalists still biased against Nintendo ?

[MDMAlliance]

fatslob-:O said:

MDMAlliance said:

Bad system?  Are you saying that a system that doesn't sell terribly well is a bad system?  How exactly are you defining "bad system?"  

And no, I don't think they are right about the Wii U now.  You know why?  Because they are making future predictions about the Wii U and making baseless assumptions about the system.  

Here let me make it obvious to you on what a bad system is. A BAD SYSTEM IS WHEN THE MARKET LARGELY REJECTS IT !!!. 

Was that a better definition of a "bad system" ? (In terms of public reception ofcourse)

You realize the WII U is doing poorly compared to its unprecedented predecessor. Oh and BTW if the super mario 3D world fails to make the market flood then what ?

So any system or product that doesn't sell is bad?  That surely defies logic.  Quality systems aren't always what sells.  The reason the Wii U isn't selling so well is because it is suffering from a software issue.

And what is a better definition of a "bad system" you ask?  How about objective flaws with the system, not something so subjective like a so-called representative of an owner of the system or relative sales.  

Also, there's no doubt that Super Mario 3D World will create a boost in sales.  It may create more momentum for the system, but I personally don't think that 3D World alone will be enough.  I think those titles announced for 2014 are going to give the Wii U the push it needs.  

Stop the condescending tone.  I am pretty well informed on what's going on.