spurgeonryan said:
tbone51 said:
Shinobi-san said:
wait people actually believe that Nintendo didn't pay for Monster Hunter exclusivity?
How do you explain the game not releasing on PSV as well?
If the game had gone multiplat then yeah sure, that would make business sense from Capcom. But exclusive to a new platform that the game has never been on before? Uhm yeah.
That would be a very odd decision from Capcom.
But then again looking at the numbers this week....with 3DS having a huge % of the market...the decision to go exclusive doesn't look that bad. But still the game would have sold at least a million on the PSV in addition to 3DS sales. That's a lot of lost revenue.
I don't think its possible for anyone to reasonably argue that Nintendo didn't pay for it. It was a good move by Nintendo imo, I don't see why people are trying to make as if that didn't happen. |
There is no proof nintendo money hatted Capcom. Yes i believe they did but capcom could of just thought it do better on 3ds and keep it on 1 platform which in this case is the best scenario |
Vita sales and the PSP killed any shot of Capcom releasing a MH on the Vita.
@ Outlaw
You are kidding right? It has only been 2 days. The other one had double the amount of time.
|
not true, vita wasnt out yet wen they announce the game, it was a gamble and they went with the right choice!
