richardhutnik said:
Companies get lucky. I believe Sony got lucky. They were likely going to do the DRM thing as you said and also very likely were going 4GB GDDR5. They then see the writing on the wall, and do 8GB GDDR5, and throws Microsoft off. After this, Microsoft walks into the DRM trap and tips off Sony, so Sony backs off and Microsoft takes the hit. Sony also was likely going $500 with the camera, but sees the camera is an issue, so they drop the camera and drop it $100. Microsoft got stuck. In short, Microsoft handed Sony all the advantages and is trying to win the perception war with these replies. They replies consists of "wait and see", "you don't understand", and other floated rumors like the second GPU. And just like Nintendo is hinged upon the second screen with the Wii U being a MUST HAVE feature, Microsoft is now having to push Kinect 2.0 and the cloud (with always on off the table, cloud really isn't even there). If this were a political campaign, Microsoft got Karl Roved and had all their strengths of the ONE turned against it, saying online isn't needed AND Kinect doesn't need to be on. |
...or Sony didn't change a thing about their model outside of PSN+ and the developer friendliness and watched Microsoft go down in flames in May.







