Nirvana_Nut85 said:
First of all, Nintendo has never relied on 3rd part multiplats and it would be absurd to assume they did now. Patcher has basically been wrong on every Nintendo related prediction and it would not be wise to take his crystal ball predictions. |
Yes, according to history Nintendo did depend on third parties, but they ruled them with an unwavering attitude. They couldn't spread to Sega because Sega during the Genesis era couldn't spread their marketshare until the SNES era and had to rely solely on first party which made everything from action games to first party sports titles just to measure up. Eventually when the Playstation and Saturn came there was alternative hardware with CD technology and Nintendo was afraid of piracy so they stuck with discs. Third party wanted Discs, especially since the trend with CD roms was already the norm on PC in the mid 90's. Nintendo stuck with cartidges and sealed their fate and lost half of their marketshare because of it.
Pachter has not been wrong about all things Nintendo, and obviously the man is not perfect, but he has to have done something right as a Wedbush analyst or else he wouldn't have a job.
I'll bet the Wii U without third parties will struggle to reach forty million. The reason I say this is because without third party the first parties audience doesn't grow exponentially, it generally stays the same. The Wii's case was widely exceptional.
If you have paid attention to the sales of hardware, all consoles that lacked third party have had a hard time winning any generation.