| hinch said: @Carl2291 |
Which would continue to be irrelevant to the topic, as it removes the $100 difference. We're talking about the core package. The Microsoft guy is talking about the core package. He isnt talking about a random bundle available at one retailer in France.
Granted, that bundle does have a hell of a lot of value for the cost. More than what you get when you buy your Day One Edition, Ill give you that. Its just not relevant to the topic at hand.
| S.T.A.G.E. said: The lie is over. They never needed the Kinect to be in the Xbox One for it to function. The Wii or Wii U is a complete experience combo, which is different. Microsoft nor Sony have truthfully ever had a complete experience with their peripherals. That is something you need to accept. It has the same vailidity as the PSEye because both do camera motion tracking complete with voice command for a cheaper price (most likely so they can bundle the move with it for $100). P.S. I will admit though, that Sony is trying to add the Kinect to the home multimedia experience. Its not solid just yet, but we'll see. |
None of what you said makes any sense at all.
Kinect being required or not has nothing at all to do with the topic at hand. Its bundled. Kinect has a 100% attach ratio. If there is a feature in a game that needs Kinect, its there. If there is a feature for an app that needs Kinect, its there. If they change the system so that you need Kinect to turn it on... Its there.
Kinect is bundled and it adds to the value of the Xbox One package. End of.
iamdeath said:
So much for being irrelevant. |
Did you even read what you quoted?
I bolded it for you and cut out everything else, just to make sure.
Can you tell me how theyre trolling by the way? Id love to hear your reasons.
